Arkansas Shareholder Law Survey
What follows is a brief survey of Arkansas shareholder law with a focus on minority shareholder rights and relief when those rights have been ignored or violated.
Hopkins Centrich is Greater Houston’s premier firm for shareholder oppression matters. Over the decades we have provided cutting edge, high quality, creative legal solutions for minority shareholders in Texas closely held corporations when the majority owners have abused their rights. We have also worked with clients in law firms across the country in all manner of cases where the rights of minority shareholders have been impinged on and they have suffered loss – economic, intellectual property, goodwill, and more.
Arkansas is a Statutory State
Statutory states have adopted specific statutes governing minority shareholder oppression claims in corporations. Key characteristics of statutory states regarding shareholder oppression include:
Oppression statute - The state legislature has enacted a statute expressly addressing shareholder oppression causes of action.
Statutory remedies - The law provides statutory remedies for oppression, such as dissolution or a forced buyout of the minority's shares.
Here are some key aspects of minority shareholder oppression claims under Arkansas statute (A.C.A. § 4-26-1108):
Statutory remedies - The law provides statutory remedies like dissolution or a forced buyout.
Statutory definitions - The statute defines conduct constituting oppression.
Case precedent - Arkansas courts look to the language of the statute in analyzing and applying the law.
Expansion of common law - The statute expands shareholder protections beyond those available under common law.
Standing requirements - The law specifies which shareholders have standing to bring an oppression claim.
Statutory burdens - Burdens of proof are allocated by the statute rather than common law principles.
Director conflicts - The statute dictates when demand on the corporation may be excused due to director conflicts.
Binding precedent - The statutory law takes precedence over any contrary common law rulings.
Legislative intent - Courts attempt to interpret the statute consistent with legislative intent.
Key Things to Remember in Arkansas Shareholder Oppression Matters
There are several key aspects to shareholder actions under Arkansas law that must be considered:
Statutory Basis - Arkansas has adopted a shareholder oppression statute, A.C.A. § 4-26-1108, that provides a cause of action.
Standing - Minority shareholders must own at least 20% or more of the outstanding shares or voting power to sue.
Grounds - Conduct that is unfairly prejudicial toward shareholders or unfairly disregards shareholder interests constitutes oppression.
Direct Suit - Oppression claims must be brought directly by the shareholder, not derivatively.
Demand Requirement - Demand may be excused if the directors are under the alleged wrongdoer's control.
Remedies - The court can order remedies including dissolution, buyout of shares, or other equitable relief.
Burden of Proof - Minority shareholders have the burden to show oppression occurred.
Director Liability - Directors who abused their authority can be held personally liable.
Attorney's Fees - Reasonable attorney's fees and costs may be awarded to a successful plaintiff.
Close Corporation Focus - The law focuses on protecting minority shareholders in close corporations.
Hopkins Centrich, Your Shareholder Oppression Law Firm For Fraud and Misrepresentation Claims
Hopkins Centrich PLLC provides cutting edge, high quality, creative legal solutions for minority shareholders in Texas closely held corporations when their rights have been abused by the majority owners. Our attorneys and staff have decades of experience in virtually every aspect of business law in The Woodlands and Texas. We have designed and incorporated businesses, managed their every legal concern, engaged in litigation on their behalf, aided with mergers and acquisitions, as well as having managed mergers, acquisitions, and sales.
Hopkins Centrich knows Texas business law. We are uniquely positioned to help shareholders when they have amble cause to believe their rights are being violated. When we work with a client, our sole focus is on them. We take advantage of everything technology has to offer in order to optimize how we work. That gives us more time to spend with clients, more time to understand the issues, more time to negotiate and prepare for trial. We get that no one wants to contact a law firm unless they feel they absolutely must. When they do, it almost always means that ‘things have reached a head.’
The attorneys and staff of Hopkins Centrich understand what you are going through. We will make the process understandable; you will know what is happening with your case every step of the way and you will never have to track us down for answers.
Have You Experienced Minority Shareholder Oppression?
Minority Shareholder Oppression occurs when the majority shareholders act with prejudice, unfairness, and lack of probity towards the minority thereby frustrating their reasonable expectations as owners.
Here is a concise but by no means exhaustive rundown of some of the main grounds that could support a shareholder oppression claim under the Arkansas statute (A.C.A. § 4-26-1108):
Breach of fiduciary duty - The controlling shareholders breach their fiduciary duties owed to the minority.
Misapplication of corporate assets - Assets are wasted or improperly used by the majority for personal benefit.
Excessive compensation - The majority pays themselves excessive salaries, bonuses or other compensation.
Denial of access to records - Refusing to allow the minority shareholders to inspect corporate documents.
Withholding information - Failure to provide details about corporate activities and financial performance.
Denial of voting rights - Not allowing the minority shareholders to vote their shares.
Interference with employment - Unjustly firing the minority shareholders from employment with the company.
Misrepresentation - The majority provides false or misleading information about company affairs.
Diversion of business opportunities - Usurping a lucrative business opportunity for the majority's personal benefit.
Freeze-out techniques - Tactics used by the majority to force the minority shareholders out.
Looting - Majority shareholders steal or siphon away corporate assets.
Fraudulent conduct - Defrauding the minority shareholders through deception, false statements, or non-disclosures.
If any of this applies to you, please contact us as soon as possible.
