Wyoming Shareholder Law Survey
What follows is a brief survey of Wyoming shareholder law with a focus on minority shareholder rights and relief when those rights have been ignored or violated.
Hopkins Centrich is Greater Houston’s premier firm for shareholder oppression matters. Over the decades we have provided cutting edge, high quality, creative legal solutions for minority shareholders in Texas closely held corporations when the majority owners have abused their rights. We have also worked with clients in law firms across the country in all manner of cases where the rights of minority shareholders have been impinged on and they have suffered loss – economic, intellectual property, goodwill, and more.
Wyoming Shareholder Oppression
Wyoming is a non-statutory state when it comes to shareholder oppression. In non-statutory states claims primarily rely on common law principles rather than a specific oppression statute. Key characteristics of Wyoming shareholder oppression actions include:
No Oppression Statute - Wyoming has no specific shareholder oppression statute and relies on common law.
Minimal Corporate Formalities - Wyoming offers extreme flexibility regarding corporate formalities.
Bearer Shares Allowed - Ownership is determined by physical possession of the share certificates.
Perpetual Duration - Corporations can opt for unlimited perpetual duration rather than a set number of years.
No State Income Taxes - Corporations pay no state income tax, offering tax advantages.
Range of Purposes - Corporations can be formed for any lawful purpose in Wyoming.
No Cap on Director Terms - There are no limits on how many terms a director can serve.
Privacy Protections - Access to shareholder names can be restricted.
Remote Meetings - Virtual shareholder and director meetings are allowed.
No Citizenship Requirements - Directors/officers need not be U.S. citizens or Wyoming residents.
Wyoming, then, relies more on equitable common law principles rather than a statutory framework to address shareholder oppression.
Options for Mississippi Minority Shareholders When Their Rights are Oppressed
Here are some – but not all – of the options minority shareholders have under Mississippi law when their rights are being oppressed in a closely held company:
File a direct lawsuit against the majority shareholders and directors alleging breach of fiduciary duty or other common law claims.
Seek monetary damages through the lawsuit for losses suffered due to the alleged oppression.
Request a court-ordered buyout of the minority's shares at fair value.
Petition for judicial dissolution of the company if the oppression is extreme and irreparable.
Seek alternative equitable remedies like appointment of a custodian or provisional director.
Negotiate a private buyout of shares or other settlement agreement with the majority owners.
Explore mediation to resolve issues leading to the alleged oppression.
Review corporate bylaws and agreements for protections that can be legally enforced.
Call a special shareholder meeting to attempt to remove or elect directors who may address issues.
Allege the majority's conduct constitutes a breach of their fiduciary duties to the minority.
Argue the majority's actions violate public policy protecting minority shareholders.
Obtain counsel experienced in shareholder disputes to advocate for the minority's rights.
Assert the majority's conduct constitutes tortious interference with business expectancies.
Hopkins Centrich, Your Shareholder Oppression Law Firm For Fraud and Misrepresentation Claims
Hopkins Centrich PLLC provides cutting edge, high quality, creative legal solutions for minority shareholders in Texas closely held corporations when their rights have been abused by the majority owners. Our attorneys and staff have decades of experience in virtually every aspect of business law in The Woodlands and Texas. We have designed and incorporated businesses, managed their every legal concern, engaged in litigation on their behalf, aided with mergers and acquisitions, as well as having managed mergers, acquisitions, and sales.
Hopkins Centrich knows Texas business law. We are uniquely positioned to help shareholders when they have amble cause to believe their rights are being violated. When we work with a client, our sole focus is on them. We take advantage of everything technology has to offer in order to optimize how we work. That gives us more time to spend with clients, more time to understand the issues, more time to negotiate and prepare for trial. We get that no one wants to contact a law firm unless they feel they absolutely must. When they do, it almost always means that ‘things have reached a head.’
The attorneys and staff of Hopkins Centrich understand what you are going through. We will make the process understandable; you will know what is happening with your case every step of the way and you will never have to track us down for answers.
Have You Experienced Minority Shareholder Oppression?
Minority Shareholder Oppression occurs when the majority shareholders act with prejudice, unfairness, and lack of probity towards the minority thereby frustrating their reasonable expectations as owners.
Here is a concise but by no means exhaustive rundown of some of the grounds that could support legal action when a shareholder’s rights are oppressed by the majority owners of a closely held company in Wyoming:
Breach of fiduciary duty - The controlling shareholders breach their fiduciary duties owed to the minority.
Misapplication of corporate assets - Assets are wasted or improperly used by the majority for personal benefit.
Excessive compensation - The majority pays themselves excessive salaries, bonuses or other compensation.
Denial of access to records - Refusing to allow the minority shareholders to inspect corporate documents.
Withholding information - Failure to provide details about corporate activities and financial performance.
Denial of voting rights - Not allowing the minority shareholders to vote their shares.
Interference with employment - Unjustly firing the minority shareholders from employment with the company.
Misrepresentation - The majority provides false or misleading information about company affairs.
Diversion of business opportunities - Usurping a lucrative business opportunity for the majority's personal benefit.
Freeze-out techniques - Tactics used by the majority to force the minority shareholders out.
Looting - Majority shareholders steal or siphon away corporate assets.
Fraudulent conduct - Defrauding the minority shareholders through deception, false statements, or non-disclosures.
Unfair treatment - Singling out the minority for inferior treatment without valid cause.
If any of this applies to you, please contact us as soon as possible.
